ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
If you've read my previous journals, or browsed through my gallery, you'll know I'm a big fan of "gentle" HDR. Taking into account the feedback I received, I have been experimenting somewhat with my post processing. I still maintain that the most important step is the moments leading up to when you take the shot, but post-processing can be make or break.
Some of my most recent shots do not feature HDR at all. In fact, if they were "full blown" HDR, it would probably ruin them. I have also been experimenting with bigger apertures and hand holding the camera, rather than relying on the tripod all the time. This permits some interesting depth of field, and some experimentation with composition, such as the near ground level shots at the Giant's Ring. This produces something different to what the average person standing up will ever see. I am trying to go back to basics a little and concentrate first and foremost on getting a decent shot in the camera.
I do like the clarity of some of my non-HDRs, such as the flower pictures and the sunset (which is one of my favourites). These photos, also taken at as low an ISO as I can go and with a "vibration reduction" lens, seem to produce a clarity which is missing from some of the HDRs. (I thought perhaps like the difference between a watercolour and an oil painting).
I haven't given up totally on HDR so far. I find that it is useful for regaining a bit of lost detail, where due to the situation, or my own lack of skill, I can't quite get the exposure spot on. I have cranked down the settings further in Photomatix, to about 20% or 30% Strength, kept Luminosity close to 0, the Microcontrast around 2, and upped the Microsmoothing to about 20. Also, I may now use only two exposures, at no more than +/- 1EV. This will produce a less dramatic, and perhaps less pleasing result initially, but with the same general post processing, produces results I'm happy with.
I can't quite throw HDR away, because I think it can alter the local contrasts to produce a pleasing result. But I will blend back in an original exposure to calm the effect down if necessary. Perhaps I end up with a half way between the "traditional" look and HDR (where I run the risk of everyone disliking it ). But if I get a few "I like it" (whether or not followed by "Is this HDR?") comments, I will feel like I've succeeded.
So, from now on, if I think HDR processing will make the photo look better I will use it as gently as I can, if not, then I won't use it at all... and I will continue to learn and modify my techniques based on the feedback I get.
Some of my most recent shots do not feature HDR at all. In fact, if they were "full blown" HDR, it would probably ruin them. I have also been experimenting with bigger apertures and hand holding the camera, rather than relying on the tripod all the time. This permits some interesting depth of field, and some experimentation with composition, such as the near ground level shots at the Giant's Ring. This produces something different to what the average person standing up will ever see. I am trying to go back to basics a little and concentrate first and foremost on getting a decent shot in the camera.
I do like the clarity of some of my non-HDRs, such as the flower pictures and the sunset (which is one of my favourites). These photos, also taken at as low an ISO as I can go and with a "vibration reduction" lens, seem to produce a clarity which is missing from some of the HDRs. (I thought perhaps like the difference between a watercolour and an oil painting).
I haven't given up totally on HDR so far. I find that it is useful for regaining a bit of lost detail, where due to the situation, or my own lack of skill, I can't quite get the exposure spot on. I have cranked down the settings further in Photomatix, to about 20% or 30% Strength, kept Luminosity close to 0, the Microcontrast around 2, and upped the Microsmoothing to about 20. Also, I may now use only two exposures, at no more than +/- 1EV. This will produce a less dramatic, and perhaps less pleasing result initially, but with the same general post processing, produces results I'm happy with.
I can't quite throw HDR away, because I think it can alter the local contrasts to produce a pleasing result. But I will blend back in an original exposure to calm the effect down if necessary. Perhaps I end up with a half way between the "traditional" look and HDR (where I run the risk of everyone disliking it ). But if I get a few "I like it" (whether or not followed by "Is this HDR?") comments, I will feel like I've succeeded.
So, from now on, if I think HDR processing will make the photo look better I will use it as gently as I can, if not, then I won't use it at all... and I will continue to learn and modify my techniques based on the feedback I get.
Lessons Learned in 2010
I thought I would sneak out another journal update while I have a little time on my hands... :)
As the year draws to a close, I was reflecting on what I had learned this year to improve my photography. The more I learn the more I feel there is to learn. While I write this as a reference as much for myself, here are some quick tips, most of which I'm sure are widely known, which I hope to apply to my work in future:
A minute extra spent when shooting the photograph can save an hour in post-processing. i.e. if circumstances permit, take time and try to shoot the best you can get. Don't rely on Photoshop to cover up any mistakes.
Move around
One of my Biggest Achievements So Far...
It's hard to believe another year has nearly gone. I have been really bad at adding Journal entries and keeping up with my messages. I will try harder :-)
It's been a hectic few weeks with the unusually harsh winter. Hopefully a few sessions in sub zero (Celsius) temperatures have produced a couple of deviations I am proud of. As usual, I am way behind...
Back in September I received my first DD, which I was really proud of. Since then I have achieved something which I am perhaps even more amazed at and very excited about. I was contacted a while ago by a local publisher who saw some of my photos of the River Lagan online and thought they w
Wow, a DD!
I must admit, I was very surprised (but pleasantly so) to come home yesterday and discover that my photo of "The Giant's Field" had been selected as a Daily Deviation.
Thank you so much to Terri - Athenas88 (http://athenas88.deviantart.com/), and Jen - ScENeYme (http://sceneyme.deviantart.com/) for suggesting and featuring my work!
:thumb121334929:
Thanks very much also to everyone who commented on or faved my work. I must apologise in advance that I probably won't get time to thank everyone individually, but I will do my best to reply to comments and visit your galleries.
Thanks also to all of you who watch me. I really appreciate your s
July Update - Gallery Revamp
We're over half way through 2010 and I'm realising last time I updated the journal, the Christmas decorations were up and we were in the grip of a mini ice age. Thankfully nature is back in full swing, with only a couple of casualties in the garden (ironically the more exotic plants). I have been out and about with the camera recently, and my sunset shot from the top of Scrabo Hill briefly made it onto the local TV :)
Anyway, recently I was reading a few articles around dA about improving photo quality (I think from John aka kkart - check out his gallery if you haven't already!) and something I read about sharpness made me want to go back an
© 2009 - 2024 Gerard1972
Comments3
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
"I can't quite throw HDR away, because I think it can alter the local contrasts to produce a pleasing result. But I will blend back in an original exposure to calm the effect down if necessary"
I do that with pretty much every HDR image I make. The majority of mine arnt HDR's though, I dont make them that often unless I really need the additional dynamic range. Usually I find the 20D's got more than enough for most scenes with a bit of PP!
I do that with pretty much every HDR image I make. The majority of mine arnt HDR's though, I dont make them that often unless I really need the additional dynamic range. Usually I find the 20D's got more than enough for most scenes with a bit of PP!